Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Data Minimization Meets Defensible Disposition: Just Say No to ROT and Over-Retention of Personal Information

By Martin Tully and Nick Snavely
December 01, 2022

Like a good diet and regular exercise for the body, data minimization and routine, defensible purging of outmoded documents are essential to maintaining healthy organizational information hygiene. Data has a useful life. For some vital corporate records, that useful life could be nearly infinite. But for the vast majority of data, there is a point at which it no longer has business value. As data ages, the likelihood of it ever being accessed again decreases exponentially. Eventually, almost all of it becomes redundant, obsolete, or trivial (ROT).

Continued ownership of digital debris constitutes a significant and growing expense. Raw storage space may be cheap, but due to the increasing costs of security, labor, migration, maintenance, etc., the total cost of ownership of enterprise data has trended upward. Even if the trend reverses, the trajectory of increasing data volumes is unlikely to abate. Indeed, enterprise data is currently doubling every 24 months.

Moreover, obsolescent data can have negative value due to the possibility of a data breach. Unnecessary retention of personally identifiable information (PII), protected health information (PHI), payment card industry data (PCI), and a host of other consumer, employee, and business information exposes organizations to criminal, civil, and regulatory penalties. While legislative and regulatory activity had historically been focused on relatively established requirements of what organizations must keep (e.g., for tax purposes), legislators and regulators are now also focused on quickly evolving requirements of what data organizations may obtain, the manner in which they obtain it, for how long they may keep it, and how they must protect such data. Consequently, organizations are not simply spending money to store data that lacks value; they are spending money to perpetuate latent liabilities that grow more serious with time.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Role and Responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders Image

Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?