Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The chief legal officer of Fox Corp. since 2018 didn't become licensed in California until this summer, a delay one law professor described as a "big screw up" that might expose his communications with fellow Fox executives to public disclosure in the multibillion-dollar defamation litigation brought by two voting companies.
Viet Dinh, who is based in Los Angeles and regularly ranks near the top of Entertainment Law & Finance parent company ALM's annual highest-paid legal chief list, is widely viewed as the top deputy to Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch. The website Semafor, recently launched by former New York Times media writer Ben Smith, highlighted the licensing delay in a recent article.
"It is a pretty big screw up for a major corporation and a big-ticket guy," Shawn Martin, a law professor at the University of San Diego, told Semafor. Martin said that Dinh is unlikely to face sanctions, but that there could be consequences for the defamation cases brought by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic over the Fox network's coverage of the 2020 presidential election.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.