Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ballys Management and Capital, LLC v. First Korean Church of New York, 2022 WL 4489269, AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action for specific performance of a contract of sale, purchaser appealed from Supreme Court's grant of summary judgment to seller. The Appellate Division reversed and reinstated the complaint, holding that seller church had failed to demonstrate that the church's board had failed to approve the sale in accordance with the requirements of the Religious Corporations Law.
On Oct. 1, 2014, purchaser and the church executed a contract for sale of the subject property. The church's president executed the contract on behalf of the church. According to the complaint, the president had informed purchaser that the church's board, which consisted of himself, his wife, and a third family member, had approved the sale. When the church failed to close, purchasers brought this action for specific performance and damages. Supreme Court granted summary judgment to the church, based largely on the church president's affidavit stating that in 2017, after the appraised value of the property had increased, the church's board indicated that it would not process the contract until purchaser explained its plans for development of the property. Purchaser appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.