Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Young v. 101 Old Mamaroneck Road Owners Corp., 2022 WL 17480796, AppDiv, Second Dept.(memorandum opinion)
In co-op unit owner's action for declaratory and injunctive relief, unit owner appealed from Supreme Court's dismissal of the complaint. The Appellate Division modified to add a declaratory judgment in favor of the co-op corporation, and otherwise affirmed, holding that unit owner had not established that she succeeded to full title as a surviving joint tenant.
In 1992, unit owner and her father contracted to purchase shares associated with a co-op apartment. At closing, they stated an intention to take title as joint tenants with right of survivorship, and they so indicated on their mortgage application. However, when the co-op corporation issued a stock certificate to them it contained no language indicating that they were joint tenants. When the father died in 1997 unit owner requested that the board issue a certificate in her own name, and in 2004, the board did so after she supplied proof that her siblings waived any interest they might have in the apartment. In 2017, unit owner entered into a contract to sell the apartment, and the board approved the sale, but then reversed itself, explaining that the 2004 certificate was invalid and that it viewed the 1993 certificate as conveying a tenant in common. The board would not consent to the sale without approval from a court-appointed representative of the father's estate. Unit owner initiated a proceeding in Surrogate's Court to obtain that approval, but discontinued the proceeding when she discovered a Medicaid recovery lien against her stepmother's estate, which might have encumbered her father's estate. Although the father and stepmother were estranged by the tie of the initial purchase of the apartment, unit owner could not obtain proof of a divorce. Unit owner, proceeding pro se, then brought this action in Supreme Court for relief that would require them to recognize the validity of the 2004 stock certificate. Supreme Court dismissed the complaint.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.