Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Development

By NYRE Staff
February 01, 2023
|

Invalid Condition on Special Permit Does Not Invalidate Permit

Schachtler Stone Produce, LLC v. Town of Marshall,, 2022 WL 5406399, AppDiv, Fourth Dept. (memorandum opinion)

In landowner's article 78 proceeding challenging the order of the zoning board of appeals (ZBA) upholding a stop work order on landowner's mine, the town appealed from Supreme Court's grant of the petition. The Appellate Division modified to vacate Supreme Court's grant of a declaration, and otherwise affirmed, holding that the ZBA had previously issued a valid special use permit and the town had no authority to regulate landowner's mining operations.

Landowners own a quarry in an agricultural zone, which permits mining by special use permit. In 2013, the ZBA issued a special use permit approving an application for mining, subject to various conditions. In 2019, the ZBA adopted a resolution concluding that the conditions were not enforceable. Meanwhile, in 2018, landowner applied for and obtained a mining permit from the state Department of Environmental Conservation. The permit allowed blasting and drilling, which led to conflicts with neighbors, including the town's chief enforcement officer, who issued a notice of violation and a stop work order. Landowner appealed to the ZBA, which affirmed the stop work order, concluding that the 2013 special use permit was null and void. Landowner then brought this article 78 proceeding, seeking to vacate the resolution, and to enjoin the town from regulating or prohibiting mining on the property. Supreme Court granted the petition, and also issued a declaratory judgment.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.