Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
IP News
Patent Infringement and Trade Dress In the Ninth Circuit
In Mosaic Brands, Inc. v. Ridge Wallet LLC, 55 F.4th 1354, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2022), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded a judgment from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Background
Mosaic Brands, Inc (Mosaic) sued Ridge Wallet, LLC (Ridge) for trade dress infringement under the Lanham Act. In addition, both Mosaic and Ridge accused the other of patent infringement. Mosaic asserted that Ridge infringed U.S. Patent No. 7,334,616 ('616 patent) and Ridge asserted that Mosaic infringed U.S. Patent No. 10,791,808 ('808 patent). Mosaic and Ridge both make similar money-clip wallets. The District Court granted Mosaic's motion for summary judgment and held that Ridge's patent was invalid. Additionally, the District Court granted summary judgement to Ridge on Mosaic's trade dress claim. Mosaic appealed the claim construction of the terms "lip" and "of varying thickness" for the '616 patent along with the summary judgment ruling against its trade dress claim. Ridge appealed the summary judgment holding as to its '808 patent.
Patent Infringement: Claim Construction Issues
The Ninth Circuit held that the District Court's construction of the terms "lip" and "of varying thickness" was correct. In particular, the Ninth Circuit found that "lip" was limited to extrudable plastic materials and "of varying thickness" means "having a thickness, defining the outer dimensions of the holder, that causes the outer dimensions of the holder to be thicker in some parts and thinner in others." The written description of the '616 patent stated that the device of the invention is constructed of extrudable plastic materials. This statement in the specification did not specify that this only applied to a best mode or a particular embodiment of the invention. Therefore, the Ninth Circuit held that the use of "lip" is limited to extrudable plastic materials. As for "of varying thickness," the specification also mentioned having a thickness defining the outer dimensions of the holder that causes the outer dimensions of the holder to be thicker in some parts and thinner in some parts. Mosaic argued that "of varying thickness" had a plain and ordinary meaning throughout the patent and offered only extrinsic evidence of definitions in support of its stance. The Ninth Circuit held that the District Court's construction of a holder that causes the outer dimensions of the holder to be thicker in some parts and thinner in some parts is correct.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.