Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
General counsel may find themselves pulled into difficult conversations with top executives as the Securities and Exchange Commission tightens its rules on company insiders looking to dump their stock.
Insider trading has long been an SEC bugbear. But the steady drumbeat of outrage over high-level executives trading on information ahead of the public has ramped up over the last two decades, said securities law expert Karen Woody, a professor at Washington and Lee University. Suspicion that trades were becoming too well-timed led to unanimous agreement at the SEC that it was time to update its longstanding rule under which corporate insiders are allowed to schedule trades in advance.
"There are some old-school theories about why some people are against regulating insider trading — one argument is that insider trading is an employment perk. It's part of your executive compensation," Woody said. "But this rule is truly the opposite. It says, 'We're not going to let you game the system just because you happen to be working there.'"
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?