Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Dec. 27, 2022, the Second Circuit published its long-anticipated decision in United States v. Blaszczak, which had been argued more than 18 months earlier. The Circuit vacated defendants' convictions on multiple counts arising out of a scheme to appropriate information regarding the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' reimbursement rates, which information the Court held was not "property" or a "thing of value" for purposes of the relevant statutes.
This decision will limit the government's ability to bring fraud or insider trading prosecutions where the information used to achieve an advantage is regulatory information held by the government. Also, the Second Circuit is now in greater alignment with the Supreme Court's wire fraud jurisprudence in Kelly and other recent cases. Finally, a concurring opinion raises important questions about the current landscape for insider trading prosecutions and demonstrates why only Congress can resolve these issues by finally passing an insider trading statute.
|The conduct at issue in this case involved trading in securities based on information about proposed regulations issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). CMS sets the rate at which Medicare and Medicaid will reimburse health care providers. Blaszczak, a hedge fund consultant and former employee of CMS, maintained ties to current CMS employees (including a co-defendant), and thus enjoyed advance access to information regarding CMS's upcoming regulatory actions. In essence, the scheme involved Blaszczak learning nonpublic information regarding CMS's planned reimbursement changes from his CMS contacts; the trading on that information by members of the conspiracy; and reaping the profit.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.