Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Second Circuit Narrows Reach of Wire Fraud and Insider Trading Prohibitions

By Harry Sandick, Anna Blum and Abigail Marion
February 01, 2023

On Dec. 27, 2022, the Second Circuit published its long-anticipated decision in United States v. Blaszczak, which had been argued more than 18 months earlier. The Circuit vacated defendants' convictions on multiple counts arising out of a scheme to appropriate information regarding the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' reimbursement rates, which information the Court held was not "property" or a "thing of value" for purposes of the relevant statutes.

This decision will limit the government's ability to bring fraud or insider trading prosecutions where the information used to achieve an advantage is regulatory information held by the government. Also, the Second Circuit is now in greater alignment with the Supreme Court's wire fraud jurisprudence in Kelly and other recent cases. Finally, a concurring opinion raises important questions about the current landscape for insider trading prosecutions and demonstrates why only Congress can resolve these issues by finally passing an insider trading statute.

Background

The conduct at issue in this case involved trading in securities based on information about proposed regulations issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). CMS sets the rate at which Medicare and Medicaid will reimburse health care providers. Blaszczak, a hedge fund consultant and former employee of CMS, maintained ties to current CMS employees (including a co-defendant), and thus enjoyed advance access to information regarding CMS's upcoming regulatory actions. In essence, the scheme involved Blaszczak learning nonpublic information regarding CMS's planned reimbursement changes from his CMS contacts; the trading on that information by members of the conspiracy; and reaping the profit.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.