Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Can a Debtor That Has No Ongoing Business Operations Reorganize Under Chapter 11 In Good Faith?

By Lawrence J. Kotler and Roxanne J. Indelicato
March 01, 2023

Under Section 1112(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code (the code), a bankruptcy court may convert or dismiss a Chapter 11 case for "cause," including, for example, when a debtor files a bankruptcy petition in bad faith. In a recent decision, In re HONX, No 22-90035 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2022), the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the court) addressed whether a debtor that has no independent assets or ongoing business operations can reorganize under Chapter 11 in good faith.

Background

From 1965 to 1998, HONX, Inc. — a wholly owned subsidiary of the Hess Corp. — operated a petroleum refinery on the island of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Since the 1980s, more than 1,500 plaintiffs filed personal injury suits against HONX and its predecessors alleging that they were exposed to asbestos at HONX's refinery.

In April 2022, in response to an influx of asbestos-related lawsuits, HONX filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy relief under Chapter 11. Although HONX (the debtor) has yet to file a proposed plan of reorganization, it indicated that it is going to file a plan and, as part of the plan, seek to resolve its asbestos liabilities through the establishment of a Section 524(g) trust. The proposed trust, which would be wholly funded by the debtor's parent company, would be used to pay present and future asbestos claimants.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.