Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Board of Managers of Van Wyck Glen Condominium v. Van Wyck At Merritt Park Homeowners Association, Inc., 2022 WL 17660405, App Div, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action by two condominiums action for declaratory relief against a homeowners association and its board members, homeowners association and the board members appealed from Supreme Court's denials of their motion to dismiss. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the condominiums' amendment of their bylaws released them from the obligation to pay the homeowners association for services.
The same sponsor developed two condominium communities and their governing documents appointed the homeowners association to provide repair and maintenance services for the common elements. Those documents also authorized the association to collect assessments from the unit owners, and provided that the condominium "shall be deemed to have irrevocably appointed" the homeowners association to provide those services. After the sponsor relinquished control, disputes arose between the condominiums and the homeowners association, and the condominium sought to take control of those services. The condominiums then brought this action seeking a declaration about the meaning of the irrevocable appointment, and seeking damages from the board members for breach of fiduciary duty. After settlement negotiations and a Supreme Court order directing the condominiums to hold meetings to amend their bylaws, the two condominiums conducted meetings at which the homeowners approved amendments to their bylaws deleting the irrevocable appointment language. Supreme Court then granted summary judgment to the condominiums dismissing the homeowners association's counterclaim for a judgment declaring the meaning of "irrevocable managing agent", and denied the association's motion to dismiss the claim for rental revenue wrongfully retained by the association and its board members.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.