Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Transactions have slowed in just about every category for commercial real estate and net lease is no exception. The reasons are myriad for that but let's boil them down to two in particular: 1) sellers do not want to sell their property for less money than it was worth previously; and 2) sellers are taking on more risk and getting the same return.
Sellers, quite understandably, do not like the idea of selling something for less money than it was previously worth. Unfortunately, with many net lease assets having minimal or no rental increases in the base term, a diminishing lease term, and difficulty backfilling the locations at similar rent, values for these asset classes might never return to what they were just a year ago in our professional lifetime. This psychological issue prevents transactions from occurring. Most net lease owners didn't realize or wouldn't acknowledge the bond bubble that propelled property values had ended at some point, and many owners still don't understand what that means.
The second issue is a real problem. Today's sellers with existing financing have to take on more risk to get the same return they are currently getting. With interest rates and thus, the debt constant, higher today than yesterday, replacing cash flow means buying at a higher cap than the one they're selling. Since a cap rate is a measurement of risk compared to alternative investments, they're taking on more risk to get the same return. Furthermore, their current loan is an asset, and once they sell their property, that asset disappears. For many owners that might normally transact, it simply doesn't pencil, and they stop transacting.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.