Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Jan. 20, 2023, a Federal Circuit panel of Judges Reyna, Chen, and Stark issued an opinion, authored by Judge Reyna, with Judge Stark dissenting, in Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Apple Inc., 57 F.4th 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2023). The panel affirmed the Eastern District of Texas's final judgment that U.S. Patent No. 8,191,091 (the '091 patent) "is unenforceable based on prosecution laches." Id. at 1350.
Personalized Media Communications (PMC) sued Apple for infringement of the '091 patent by Apple's "FairPlay" digital rights management product. Id. After "a jury returned a unanimous verdict, finding that Apple infringed," it "awarded PMC over $308 million in reasonable-royalty damages." Id. The district court then held a bench trial on remaining issues and "found the '091 patent unenforceable based on prosecution laches." Id. The district court explained that "laches required a challenger to prove that the applicant's delay was unreasonable and inexcusable under the totality of the circumstances and that there was prejudice attributable to the delay." Id. Applying that "framework, the court found that PMC engaged in an unreasonable and unexplained delay amounting to an egregious abuse of the statutory patent system." Id.
The '091 patent issued from a massive patent family created by PMC. Just prior to the 1995 change in patent term calculation from 17 years from issuance to 20 years from priority date, "PMC filed 328 GATT-Bubble applications." Id. at 1355. "'GATT-Bubble' applications" are applications filed in an effort to "take advantage of the existing law providing a patent term keyed from issuance." Id. at 1350, n.2. PMC's applications were "atypically long and complex … containing over 500 pages of text and over 22 pages of figures" and initially included only "a single claim" that was "subsequently amended." Id. This strategy ultimately led to PMC prosecuting somewhere between "6,000 to 20,000 claims" in the patent family. Id. at 1350-51. At issue in this case, were claims related to a "method of decrypting programming at a receiver station" Id. at 1352.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.