Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Clarke v. Fifth Ave. Development Co., LLC, 2022 WL 17490826, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In tenants' action for fraud and breach of the warranty of habitability, tenants appealed from Supreme Court's denial of their summary judgment motion. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that issues of fact precluded summary judgment on the habitability claim.
Tenants alleged that landlord advertised elevator service on the building website, but never indicated that repairs would take the elevator temporarily out of service. Based on these facts, tenants asserted claims for fraud, breach of the warranty of habitability, and constructive eviction. Supreme Court denied tenants' summary judgment motion.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?