Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Rights of Tenant to Security Deposit When Landlord Files for Bankruptcy
As we debate whether there will be a "soft" or "hard" landing of the economy and the resulting effect of different landings on the volume of bankruptcy filings, it is helpful to review how a bankruptcy filing affects not only rights between a creditor and the debtor, but also the respective rights of creditors against property held by the debtor. These rights may be determined by in what capacity the debtor is holding the property. For example, Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, which governs the disposition of executory contracts, has specific provisions regarding the disposition of commercial real estate leases in bankruptcy. These provisions address, among other things, the rights of a tenant to remain in possession of the leased premises when the landlord files a bankruptcy case and rejects the lease. But what rights does a tenant have with regard to the security deposit delivered by the tenant to the landlord to secure the tenant's performance under the lease when the landlord files for bankruptcy and rejects the lease?
This issue was recently considered by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of 10FN v. Cerebus Business Finance, Case No. 1-CV-5996 (VEC) (Oct. 18, 2022). In that case, a subtenant's security deposit was swept from the master tenant's bank account by its secured lenders just prior to the master tenant's bankruptcy filing. The subtenant sued the secured lenders and some of the master tenant's executives, arguing that the lenders and executives all knew the security deposit was in the account and the master tenant held the security deposit in trust for the subtenant. The subtenant alleged that by sweeping the account, the secured lenders unlawfully took the funds, and the master tenant executives were negligent in letting that happen. The court held the security deposit was not held in trust either under the terms of the sublease or by operation of state and local law, and it was merely an unsecured loan by the subtenant to the master tenant that was subject to set-off if the subtenant defaulted under lease. Consequently, the subtenant was reduced to the status of an unsecured creditor in the master tenant's bankruptcy case for the amount of the security deposit and could not assert claims against the secured lenders or the master tenant's executives.
The Master Tenant's Secured Lenders Swept the Subtenant's Security Deposit Just Prior to Bankruptcy
According to the opinion, Network Innovations d/b/a Nitel, Inc. (Nitel) subleased office space in Chicago from Rocket Fuel, Inc. Pursuant to the sublease, Nitel provided Rocket Fuel with a $271,092.87 security deposit. The terms of the sublease did not require Rocket Fuel to segregate the security deposit or to hold it in trust.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?