Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Corporate legal departments are increasingly receiving requests from business clients to use ChatGPT or similar AI-powered tools in their operations. These requests can be urgent, with business clients demanding enablement from legal. This article is in two parts: Part One briefly details what "generative AI" tools like ChatGPT are and provides an overview of key legal considerations, including by looking forward to upcoming AI-specific legislation in the EU and the U.S.; and Part Two, coming next month, will outline potential ways for corporate counsel to think about enabling engagement with this new technology.
ChatGPT is one of a suite of AI-powered technologies that is being dubbed "generative AI." These are tools that can take a prompt or query from a user (the "input") and respond to it with a type of "output" that resembles what a human would create. These tools are referred to as "generative" because they do not rely on a database of preformulated answers or responses that they can retrieve to address user input. Instead, they have been trained to "recognize" a user's input and to "generate" a response entirely on their own.
Some of the more well-known examples of generative AI include:
Generative AI tools are not restricted to any particular use case. But requests to corporate legal departments seem to be presently coalescing around several specific use cases:
While business clients may be seeing benefits from using generative AI, corporate counsel tends to focus on legal risks that may arise from permitting enterprise use. The risks of generative AI are still being discovered, so this advisory cannot present an exhaustive, closed-ended list of considerations that may be relevant to counsel. At present, however, reporting has identified several relevant considerations. Some of the more salient are:
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.