Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Attorneys and consultants involved in the FTX bankruptcy have asked the District of Delaware bankruptcy court to approve billed hours and expenses totaling just under $37 million for the first six weeks of Chapter 11 proceedings.
Those proposed fee applications, the last of which was filed Feb. 27, cover both the FTX debtor entities and the committee representing creditors, with the largest segment by far being the $25.1 million billed by FTX lead counsel Sullivan & Cromwell across two filings. See, https://bit.ly/42upM3Q; https://bit.ly/3ZfryTw. Those fees haven't been approved or denied and could end up differing from the amount attorneys actually are paid.
"In bankruptcy, either the estate is paying these fees as administrative expenses — they come before any unsecured creditors get paid, and they're paid from a diffuse source: unrestricted funds — or the funds are coming out of a carve-out of a secured creditor's collateral," said Nancy Rapoport, a professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas' law school who has served as a fee examiner in bankruptcy proceedings for Caesars Entertainment and Toys R Us. "So there's not the same relationship between what work gets billed and whose budget pays for it as there is in a normal attorney-client relationship. If someone else is paying for the fees, there's less of a 'watch the budget' push. That's where the court comes in, and the United States Trustee, and a fee examiner, if and when one is approved."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.