Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Community Housing Improvement Program v. City of New York, 2023 WL 1769666, U.S. Court of Appeals for The Second Circuit (Opinion by Parker, J.)
In an action by landlord and landlord groups challenging the constitutionality of the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (HSTPA), landlord groups appealed from the District Court's grant of the city's motion to dismiss. The Second Circuit affirmed, holding that the statute did not violate the taking or due process clauses.
Landlords contended that the statute effected a facial and regulatory taking, and that the statute violated the due process clause. In rejecting the challenge, the Second Circuit first held that the landlord had to establish that no set of circumstance exist under which the challenged act would be valid, the standard articulated by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Salerno, 481 US 739.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.