Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Commercial real estate is a unique asset, making damages resulting from a breach of an agreement involving it are often difficult to measure. As a result, parties to such agreements must give careful thought to the remedies for such breach, including liquidated damages.
Provisions for liquidated damages — that is, a pre-determined amount of compensation that a party who fails to perform must pay — are common in many kinds of real estate transactions. They obviate the need to calculate (and potentially litigate over) damages and settle the parties' expectations by operating as both a floor and a ceiling on potential liability. And because a liquidated damages provision is negotiated at the outset of the transaction (before either party knows whether or how it will be triggered), it likely represents the parties' unvarnished view of what is fair.
Such provisions, however, are often subject to later challenges. Courts will not enforce them if the amount of liquidated damages is seen as disproportionate to any damage actually incurred, or if the parties knew or should have known when they entered the contract that actual damages would be readily ascertainable.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?