Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The November 2022 tech meltdown of online access that slowed or barred consumers from buying tickets from Ticketmaster for Taylor Swift's Eras Tour, her first since 2018 and the largest one-day ticket demand Ticketmaster had ever faced, generated worldwide coverage and outrage from her fans. But the incident also resulted in a sizzling convergence of many of the issues that have plagued online sales of live events for years.
These include, among others: attacks on primary ticket sellers' websites by bots that enable ticket resellers to scoop up blocks of tickets at face value in order to sell them on the secondary market for much higher prices (though Ticketmaster claims it was able to block bots from Swift primary-ticket harvesting); a lack of transparency as to the fees (some mandated by concert venues) that ticket sellers "drip price" to ticket purchasers between the time a consumer enters an online que but sees the full price only at check out; and long-running antitrust concerns over Ticketmaster's control of a large piece of the ticket-sales market while it remains merged with the events industry's dominant concert promoter Live Nation.
On that last point, when the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) approved the merger of Live Nation and Ticketmaster back in 2010, it put into place a consent decree effective to 2020 meant to restrict the monolithic company from cross leveraging its oversized clout in concert promotion and ticket sales into requiring venue owners to book Live Nation shows and enter into exclusive contracts to utilize Ticketmaster.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.