Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Development

By NYRE Staff
May 01, 2023
|

Sand Mine Enjoys Nonconforming Use Protection

Town of Southampton v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 2023 WL 1824432, Court of Appeals (Opinion by Cannataro, A.C.J.)

In an article 78 proceeding brought by the town, various organizations and neighbors to annul an agreement between mine operator and the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), the mine operator appealed from the Appellate Division's grant of the petition. The Court of Appeals modified, holding that whether DEC has authority to issue a renewal and modification permit depends on the scope of the mine operator's prior non-conforming use.

A sand and gravel mine has been operated on the subject 50-acre Suffolk County parcel since the 1960s, when local zoning permitted mining. In 1972, the town rezoned the area to prohibit mining. Nevertheless DEC issued or renewed permits at regular intervals, and the operator obtained certificates of occupancy from the town stating that use as a sand mine was a prior nonconforming use. In 2014, the operator applied to the DEC to modify its permit to increase the depth of mining by 40 feet and to mine on additional 4.9 acres that had not been covered by previous DEC permits. Although DEC initially denied the permit application, DEC and the mine operator ultimately reached a settlement authorizing the greater depth and greater area in return for the operator's agreement to cease using the facility for receipt and processing of vegetative organic waste. The town and the neighbors brought an article 78 proceeding to annul the permit. Supreme Court denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. A divided Appellate Division modified, holding that Environmental Conservation Law 23-2703(3) barred issuing the permit in violation of the town's prohibition on mining. The mine operator appealed.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Top 5 Strategies for Managing the End-of-Year Collections Frenzy Image

End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.

The Self-Service Buyer Is On the Rise Image

Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.

Should Large Law Firms Penalize RTO Rebels or Explore Alternatives? Image

Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.

Sink or Swim: The Evolving State of Law Firm Administrative Support Image

The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?

Tax Treatment of Judgments and Settlements Image

Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.