Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This article is Part Two of a two-part article. Part One, which appeared in our March 2023 issue, discussed mechanical licenses and interactive streaming services. Part Two covers songwriters and music publishers, and record labels.
In the United States and in most foreign countries, the "performance right" is one of the most important rights of copyright and, in many cases, the most lucrative. In the United States, there is no statutory license under the Copyright Act for this right. Songwriters, composers, lyricists (jointly "writers") and music publishers join these organizations, which in turn negotiate licenses with the users of music, collect the license fees from those users and distribute the monies to writers and publishers based on surveys of performances, specific payment schedules and distribution rules, as well as other factors. All performance monies are distributed 50% to writers and 50% to music publishers.
The four primary Songwriters and Music Publishers Performing Rights Organizations (PROs) in the United States are the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) founded in 1914, Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI) founded in 1939, SESAC founded in 1930 and Global Music Rights (GMR) founded in 2013. As to revenue, the four U.S. PROs collected around 3.6 billion dollars in 2022 with ASCAP and BMI being responsible for approximately 3.1 billion dollars of that total license fees are arrived at through voluntary negotiations between each PRO and an individual user or an industry-wide negotiating committee (e.g., the Radio Music License Committee, the Television Music License Committee, etc.). If an agreement cannot be reached in the case of ASCAP and BMI and any user, federal "Rate Courts" (Southern District of New York) — pursuant to consent decrees with the government dating back to 1941 — determine "reasonable" license fees, terms and what is actually licensable. In the case of SESAC, license fees are arrived at through voluntary negotiations, but due to antitrust settlements involving local radio and local television, mandatory arbitration takes effect for those two media if voluntary agreements cannot be reached. As to Global Music Rights, all license fee negotiations are voluntary as there is no consent decree, Rate Courts, mandatory arbitration or other dispute resolution procedure other than copyright infringement litigation in effect.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.