Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In a matter of first impression not yet addressed by any circuit court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Cantwell-Cleary v. Cleary Packaging (In re Cleary Packaging), 36 F.4th 509 (4th Cir. 2022), addressed whether the discharge exceptions under Section 523(a) apply to corporate debtors under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Based on the text and purposes of Subchapter V, the Cleary court held that, unlike corporate debtors in traditional Chapter 11 cases, corporate Subchapter V debtors are subject to Section 523(a) to the same extent as individual debtors and, as such, can be denied a discharge.
In this case, the debtor, Cleary Packaging, LLC, filed for bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland and elected to proceed under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as a small business enterprise. The debtor's Subchapter V plan proposed paying just a small percentage of a prepetition $4.7 million state court judgment entered against the debtor in favor of Cantwell-Cleary Co., Inc., with the remainder of the judgment to be discharged.
Cantwell-Cleary challenged the plan by filing a complaint against the debtor seeking a declaration from the bankruptcy court that the entire $4.7 million judgment is nondischargeable under Sections 1192(2) and 523(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. The debtor moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that the discharge exceptions applied only to individual debtors and not to corporate debtors. The bankruptcy court agreed with the debtor and dismissed the complaint. Cantwell-Cleary then appealed the dismissal order directly to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.