Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In its current state, generative AI (GAI) is a promising and useful legal tool — but it's flawed. It's a powerful tool for promoting creativity and productivity in legal work, yet it's weak in the accuracy department, is riddled with bias and poses a serious threat when it comes to privacy, cybersecurity, and liability.
So how do you implement it as a useful business tool knowing that there are definite challenges? One of the largest is that GAI confidently spits out false, stilted, repetitive information that is often inaccurately sourced (or the sources are completely made up) yet reads plausibly. In fact, all AI systems — from large language models (LLM) to neural networks –– currently provide biased outputs, because they're fed an inherently biased set of data reflective of a biased, discriminatory world.
AI language models are trained on massive amounts of data to function and improve. The more data the model is trained on, the better it gets at detecting patterns, anticipating what comes next, and producing realistic text. Right now, however, there are few controls in place to stop these models from scraping personal and private information from people and business.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.