Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Three powerful startups specializing in AI-generated art — Stability AI, DeviantArt and Midjourney — have gained popularity and traction as fast as they have attained litigious attention.
Earlier in 2023, three artists sued in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California claiming three companies' AI used the plaintiffs' original works to create AI-generated images. Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd., 3:23-cv- 00201. The plaintiffs allege that "Stability downloaded or otherwise acquired copies of billions of copyrighted images without permission to create [its open-source license software] Stable Diffusion" using the downloaded content as "training images."
A key question in this class action complaint revolves around whether an AI-generated work is really as similar to the original as the plaintiffs claim. The trio of AI companies say no — as evidenced by their motions to dismiss. (The complaint also alleges unfair competition and violation of rights of publicity.)
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The LJN Quarterly Update highlights some of the articles from the nine LJN Newsletters titles over the quarter. Articles include in-depth analysis and insights from lawyers and other practice area experts.
Highlights some of the in-depth analysis and insights from lawyers and other practice area experts from the nine LJN Newsletters titles over the first quarter of 2024.