Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The lion's share of attention to copyright-infringement claims against Ed Sheeran over his 2016 Grammy-winning Song of the Year "Thinking Out Loud" recently focused on the trial in New York federal court, presided over by Southern District of New York federal Judge Louis L. Stanton, in which a jury found in Sheeran's favor in the lawsuit brought by the heirs of Ed Townsend, co-author of the 1970s soul-song classic "Let's Get It On" (LGO) with Marvin Gaye. Griffin v. Sheeran, 18-1862.
But in September 2022 in a related infringement suit over the same songs' matching chord progression and harmonic rhythm (i.e., the "backing pattern"), District Judge Stanton had allowed Structured Assets Sales, which owns an 11.11% beneficial share of Ed Townsend's song-royalty income from "Let's Get It On" to also proceed with its claim against Sheeran. Structured Asset Sales (SAS) LLC v. Sheeran, 18 Civ. 5839.
In the SAS ruling, the district judge had decided: "The law does not support Sheeran's contention that the combination of LGO's chord progression and harmonic rhythm is insufficiently original to warrant it copyrightable," adding that the "experts' disagreement on whether the backing pattern is sufficiently uncommon to warrant copyright protection is a genuine dispute as to a material fact, preventing summary judgment." (Judge Stanton also concluded that "Sheeran's motion in the alternative to dismiss SAS's claim to include concert merchandise revenue in a calculation of damages is granted, but its motion to dismiss the inclusion of concert ticket sales is denied.")
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A Q&A with conference speaker Ryan Phelan, a partner at Marshall, Gerstein & Borun and founder and moderator of legal blog PatentNext, to discuss how courts and jurisdictions are handling novel technologies, the copyrightability of AI-assisted art, and more.
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.