Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ticket Resellers' Campaign Raises Securities Law and Money Laundering Issues
One of the big issues being debated as fallout from Ticketmaster's problems in trying to service Taylor Swift fans when tour tickets went on sale in November is how to address state live-event ticket sales laws. (See the chart below for a look at legislative activity in 10 states.)
Ticket reseller StubHub recently brought Silicon Valley lobbying tactics to the Georgia Legislature with HB 398 and SB 183 but thankfully didn't put one over on the legislative members. The stated purpose of these Georgia bills is to remove resale restrictions on concert or athletic tickets, and limit the resale to reseller marketplaces like Stub Hub. This would, among other things, effectively prevent artists from taking tickets off manifest for resale through their fan clubs, including at face price.
But HB 398 and SB 183 are dead. This outbreak of sanity and common sense was helped along by the testimony of Mala Sharma of Georgia Music Partners and David Lowery, who lives in Athens, GA, and teaches at the University of Georgia at Athens Terry College of Business. The discussion at the legislature regarding property rights and tickets was brought back to focus on the initial sale and the rights of the performing artist or sports team to control transferability in the first place as an essential property right.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.