Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Reading is foundational to lawyers' work. Whatever matter a lawyer is working on, the facts and the arguments are captured in prose. Reading is likewise how lawyers maintain and hone their craft, reading to keep abreast of changes in the law and "maintain the requisite knowledge and skill" in representing clients by continuing study and education (ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.1 and Comment 8). This type of reading goes beyond the passive reading of a magazine, newspaper or novel. It requires a richer and more robust interaction with text, known as active reading.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages. Lawyers need to create, find and compare a variety of annotations, margin notes and highlights, race among multiple sections of text and return to pinpoints in supporting documents on demand. Paper supports many active reading tasks, and with advances in hardware and software, computers are getting better at building an increasingly paper-like experience. But neither is the sine qua non of active reading.
I devoted my doctoral research and embarked on a career to develop a system tailored to the needs of active readers, especially attorneys. By studying the limitations of past systems, we created a fluidlike representation of text where lawyers can restructure, revisualize and rearrange primary and secondary sources, annotations and highlights to meet the demands of a client, project or study. This article details my journey: Defining active reading processes and noting some requirements that support it, discussing how paper and current computer systems fall short of lawyers' active reading requirements and outlining the features of an active reading system for lawyers.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
Most of the federal circuit courts that have addressed what qualifies either as a "compilation" or as a single creative work apply an "independent economic value" analysis that looks at the market worth of the single creation as of the time when an infringement occurs. But in a recent ruling of first impression, the Fifth Circuit rejected the "independent economic value" test in determining which individual sound recordings are eligible for their own statutory awards and which are part of compilation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
Regardless of how a company proceeds with identifying AI governance challenges, and folds appropriate mitigation solution into a risk management framework, it is critical to begin with an AI governance program.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.