Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
With ample bravado, in recent years the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) unit of the Department of Justice (DOJ) has proclaimed that holding individuals accountable for foreign bribery schemes is of "critical importance," and that "it is unambiguously this department's first priority" to prosecute individuals in corporate criminal matters. Similarly, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) officials consistently have proclaimed that "individual accountability is critical to FCPA enforcement."
Reviewing the enforcement record, however, one sees that the volume of FCPA enforcement activity with respect to individuals has steadily declined in the last three years, and in the case of the SEC, disappeared entirely. Looking beyond the numerical decline uncovers some further patterns. Of the individuals criminally charged in connection with foreign bribery schemes in recent years, most were charged with criminal offenses other than substantive FCPA violations. The enforcement record also shows that when DOJ has brought FCPA-related charges against individuals, they are rarely the executives of the companies DOJ has pursued in its notable corporate FCPA prosecutions, but rather are foreign officials or individuals associated with small or privately held companies.
In regard to SEC enforcement, instead of focusing on individuals, recent actions have targeted entities, particularly foreign issuers, and pursued violations of the accounting provisions of the FCPA rather than substantive anti-bribery violations. Although time will tell whether the government's recent FCPA enforcement record reflects the lingering impact of COVID on investigative efforts or a longer term trend, these recent patterns are worthy of note for white-collar practitioners and company counsel addressing potential FCPA issues.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.