Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On May 9, 2023, a Federal Circuit panel consisting of Judges Reyna, Mayer and Cunningham issued a precedential opinion, authored by Judge Cunningham, in Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Mylan Pharm. Inc., Case No. 2021-1981. Patent owner Sanofi appealed from an inter partes review (IPR) Board's decision finding Sanofi's U.S. Patent No. RE47,614 (the "614 Patent") invalid as obvious, arguing that Mylan failed to assert that a prior art reference is analogous to the challenged patent and instead asserted that the reference is analogous to another prior art reference. Slip Op. at 2. The Federal Circuit agreed finding that the analogousness test was not based on the challenged patent and, therefore, Mylan did not meet its burden of establishing obviousness. Id. As a result, the Federal Circuit reversed the Board's decision.
Sanofi's 614 Patent relates to a drug delivery device that can be configured to allow setting of different dose sizes by using a "spring washer" that can exert a force on the cartridge and secure the cartridge against movement. Id. at 2-3. All claims of the 614 Patent require a "spring washer" secured by "at least two fixing elements." Id. at 3.
Mylan petitioned for IPR of all claims of Sanofi's 614 Patent based on a combination of three prior art references: Burren, Venezia and de Gennes. Id. Mylan asserted that the combination of Burren and Venezia taught the use of spring washers within drug-delivery devices and de Gennes disclosed "snap-fit engagement grips" to secure the spring washer. Id. at 3-4. Mylan argued that although de Gennes is concerned with a clutch bearing in automobiles, it nevertheless addressed a problem identified in Burren, namely "axially fixing two components relative towards each other." Id. at 4-5. Sanofi argued, among other things, that de Gennes is not analogous art to the 614 Patent because it relates to cars and not drug delivery devices or medical devices and is not reasonably pertinent to the 614 Patent's problem of "secur[ing] a cartridge against movement within a housing" — a problem that is narrower than that of Burren. Id. at 4.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.