Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On May 9, 2023, a Federal Circuit panel consisting of Judges Reyna, Mayer and Cunningham issued a precedential opinion, authored by Judge Cunningham, in Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Mylan Pharm. Inc., Case No. 2021-1981. Patent owner Sanofi appealed from an inter partes review (IPR) Board's decision finding Sanofi's U.S. Patent No. RE47,614 (the "614 Patent") invalid as obvious, arguing that Mylan failed to assert that a prior art reference is analogous to the challenged patent and instead asserted that the reference is analogous to another prior art reference. Slip Op. at 2. The Federal Circuit agreed finding that the analogousness test was not based on the challenged patent and, therefore, Mylan did not meet its burden of establishing obviousness. Id. As a result, the Federal Circuit reversed the Board's decision.
Sanofi's 614 Patent relates to a drug delivery device that can be configured to allow setting of different dose sizes by using a "spring washer" that can exert a force on the cartridge and secure the cartridge against movement. Id. at 2-3. All claims of the 614 Patent require a "spring washer" secured by "at least two fixing elements." Id. at 3.
Mylan petitioned for IPR of all claims of Sanofi's 614 Patent based on a combination of three prior art references: Burren, Venezia and de Gennes. Id. Mylan asserted that the combination of Burren and Venezia taught the use of spring washers within drug-delivery devices and de Gennes disclosed "snap-fit engagement grips" to secure the spring washer. Id. at 3-4. Mylan argued that although de Gennes is concerned with a clutch bearing in automobiles, it nevertheless addressed a problem identified in Burren, namely "axially fixing two components relative towards each other." Id. at 4-5. Sanofi argued, among other things, that de Gennes is not analogous art to the 614 Patent because it relates to cars and not drug delivery devices or medical devices and is not reasonably pertinent to the 614 Patent's problem of "secur[ing] a cartridge against movement within a housing" — a problem that is narrower than that of Burren. Id. at 4.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.