Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Real Property Law
Mortgagee's Action to Vacate Tax Sale Should Not Have Been Dismissed Even Though Redemption Period Had Expired
Newrez, LLC v. City of Middletown, 2023 WL 3215240, AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In mortgagee's action to determine adverse claims to real property, the mortgagee appealed from Supreme Court's order denying mortgagee's motion to vacate an order dismissing its complaint. The Appellate Division reversed, holding that the complaint should not have been dismissed even though the mortgagee moved to vacate a tax sale after the redemption period had expired.
On Dec. 29, 2018, the city conducted an auction of tax liens, including one on the subject property. The auction resulted in a successful bid. The terms of sale for the action specified that the redemption period would expire on Dec. 30, 2019. On Oct. 1, 2019, mortgagee acquired an assignment of an existing mortgage. On Jan. 2, 2020 — three days after the redemption period expires — mortgagee requested an opportunity to redeem the lien, but was informed that the period had expired. Mortgagee then brought this action to vacate the tax lien sale and to compel the city to accept payment for redemption of the lien. When the city failed to respond, mortgagee sought leave to enter a default judgment. Supreme Court, on its own motion, denied mortgagee's motion and directed dismissal of the complaint. Mortgagee appealed from dismissal of the complaint.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?