Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Investing in distressed CRE assets in 2023 and 2024 will be the key to earning high returns on capital in the real estate industry. What is different about this distressed cycle is that most of the lenders are not foreclosing and taking title to the CRE assets, managing, and leasing them for a few months and then selling the properties. They are more likely to sell the note/mortgage rather than foreclose on the property. Like a lot of industries including hotel management, technology manufacturing, food delivery and ride-sharing, lenders prefer to be "asset-light" concerning large and complex CRE assets. This presents a unique and interesting opportunity for astute distressed investors, who are experienced in acquiring mortgage notes secured by commercial property and in the arduous foreclosure and bankruptcy process, which may follow, to obtain a clean title to the property. Distressed investors should be raising capital right now to take advantage of the upcoming plethora of defaulted CRE loans.
CRE distress and defaults in this cycle will be caused by the following issues:
With all the above issues currently affecting about 2.0% or $90 billion of the total CRE loans outstanding of $4.5 trillion, there is a great opportunity for distressed investors to contact the various CRE lenders and seek to acquire the note and mortgage on the property at a significant discount. If the average defaulted loan is $25 million, there will be 3,600 distressed deals during the next two years from which to choose. Since today's distressed investors are accepting higher risk by buying the note/mortgage and then going through the foreclosure process, which would normally be done by the original lender, the discount on the loan paper has to be an additional 10%-15% than if the property was sold by the lender as a foreclosed asset.
For example, an office building that was valued at $100 million, with $70 million in debt at 5.0% interest only and 95% leased in 2019, is now 70% leased and worth $70 million. The NOI at purchase was at a 4.5% cap rate or $4.5 million but is now down to $3.2 million and less than the annual debt service of $3.5 million. The borrower has defaulted on the loan by missing the last three months of payments and in discussions with the lender has been unable to restructure the loan with a lower interest rate, deferred payments, or a loan paydown. The lender does not want to foreclose on the property and hires a CRE brokerage firm to sell the note/mortgage. Since potential distressed investors have to go through the foreclosure and possible bankruptcy process which in some states could take years, they will need an additional discount on the note of at least 10%-15% or a price of $59.5 million to $63 million for the $70 million loan. This represents a 37% to 59.5% and 85% to 90% discount on the original property value and loan amount, respectively. If the borrower does not tie up the distressed investor in bankruptcy, then the investor will foreclose or get a deed in lieu of foreclosure. The investor now owns the office building at the above deeply discounted price and will reap any occupancy and higher rent benefits as the local office market recovers and valuation increases as interest rates are lowered.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.