Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A company's ability to innovate, exploit, and maintain proprietary trade secrets impacts internal operations and growth, as well as, more crucially, its ability to compete in the marketplace. Recognizing the value of trade secrets, many countries have successively enacted and amended laws to strengthen the protection of corporate trade secrets. In the case of Taiwan, its Trade Secrets Act became effective in 1996 (see, Trade Secrets Act (Taiwan) (promulgated and effective on Jan. 17, 1996, last amended on Jan. 15, 2020)) and was largely modeled after the U.S. Uniform Trade Secrets Act (see, UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT (last amended 1985), 14 U.L.A. 1 (2021). As such, it only provided civil liability for trade secrets misappropriation. Compare Taiwan Trade Secrets Act (last amended 2020), with Uniform Trade Secrets Act (last amended 1985) (both incorporating using similar definitions for actionable trade secrets misappropriation, including for "trade secret" and "improper means).
Taiwan later revised the Taiwan Trade Secrets Act in 2013 to criminalize trade secrets theft, which Taiwanese companies recognized as a significant milestone in deterring such theft. Thus, Taiwan's passage of both civil and criminal trade secrets liability created greater awareness and recognition of trade secrets as valuable corporate assets. But Taiwanese companies needed guidance on how to maintain and manage this new type of intellectual property asset as, under Taiwan law (like that in the U.S.), corporations that own trade secrets bear the burden of maintaining their secrecy. Trade secrets management is still an unfamiliar area for many companies across Asia.
The Science & Technology Law Institute (the Institute) compiled the "2015 Intellectual Property Management Report of Taiwan-listed Companies," a study in which it concluded that the biggest intellectual property risk faced by Taiwanese companies is leakage of trade secrets (47.12%). See, The Institute for Information Industry, the Science & Technology Law Institute, "Taiwan's first trade secrets management standard to assist companies in reviewing management and effective implementation" (April 6, 2023). Comprehensive analysis also revealed that intellectual property managers regard trade secrets protection as their most challenging issue, particularly the inability to identify and protect corporate trade secrets. Id.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
Most of the federal circuit courts that have addressed what qualifies either as a "compilation" or as a single creative work apply an "independent economic value" analysis that looks at the market worth of the single creation as of the time when an infringement occurs. But in a recent ruling of first impression, the Fifth Circuit rejected the "independent economic value" test in determining which individual sound recordings are eligible for their own statutory awards and which are part of compilation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
Regardless of how a company proceeds with identifying AI governance challenges, and folds appropriate mitigation solution into a risk management framework, it is critical to begin with an AI governance program.