Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bankruptcy Risk and Fraud In Cryptocurrency
Cryptocurrency is indeed the result of the intersection of communications, computers, and cryptography. From the Greek word kryptos, meaning hidden, cryptocurrency establishes security over transactions in coins synthesized in cyberspace, permitting only those persons controlling the private keys (a number, often described as "alphanumeric," reflecting its high radix or base) to an address on a public distributed ledger to transact in the coin. This cryptographic process permits the party controlling a public address to remain anonymous and undetectable, while at the same time secure from most risks other than loss of the private key.
Cryptocurrency can be a little hard to understand for those not acquainted with the field. Some definitions of terms are helpful. A "cryptocoin" is a unit recorded on a cryptographic distributed ledger. A "distributed ledger" is a digital ledger that is recorded on many nodes or computer databases on the internet at once, for which transactions may only be made by someone using the cryptographic private key. Transactions on the distributed ledger are verified either by third parties solving an algorithm for which they are rewarded a coin, a process known as "mining," or by using a "consensus" system in which nodes are compared and outliers (which represent likely fraud) are eliminated. "Cold storage" is keeping one's private key either on a personally controlled hard drive or in a secure writing. The permanent loss of a private key locks an address on the distributed ledger so that the coin can no longer be transferred, essentially permanently eliminating it from circulation and reducing its value to zero.
The seminal idea behind cryptocurrency, as expressed in "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" by Satoshi Nakamoto, was to eliminate the cost of mediation and the ability of third-party intermediaries to "reverse" transactions, making trust an unnecessary feature of transacting, without the burdens of using a physical currency.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.