Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Fresh Filings

By Entertainment Law & Finance Staff
September 01, 2023

828 Media Capital, an entertainment financing company, sued investor Gunar Overbeck for breach of contract in California Superior Court, Los Angeles County. The suit, brought by Sheppard Mullin, accuses the defendant of violating a non-disclosure agreement by sharing confidential information with employees and other investors in an attempt to secure a quick return on his $100,000 investment. According to the complaint, financial returns have been slow due to the drawn-out process of independent filmmaking and distribution. The case is 828 Media Capital LLC v. Overbeck, 23STCV19501. Sony Corp. of America, rapper French Montana, his record label Coke Boys Records and other defendants have been sued for copyright infringement in North Carolina Eastern District Federal Court. The complaint, filed by Toll, Ray & Associates on behalf of Skylar Gudasz, contends that the defendants sampled the plaintiff's song "Femme Fatale" in a single and music video titled "Blue Chills" before finalizing a licensing agreement. The case is Gudasz v. Kharbouch, 4:23-cv-00137. Polsinelli and Mims, Kaplan, Burns & Garretson filed a trademark infringement lawsuit in Massachusetts District Federal Court on behalf of Three Ten Merchandising Services Inc. The complaint pursues claims against "John Doe" defendants for their ongoing use of the music group "Nickleback" mark in connection with the marketing and unauthorized sale of bootleg products such as jerseys, caps and T-shirts. The case is Three Ten Merchandising Services Inc. v. Does 1-100, 1:23-cv-11877. Twentieth Century Fox and parent company Disney have been sued for breach of contract in California Superior Court, Los Angeles County. The suit, filed by Bird Marella on behalf of TSG Entertainment Finance, accuses Fox of using "Hollywood Accounting," such as inflating above-the-line distribution expenses, to minimize the plaintiff's share of profits from more than 140 films. The suit also accuses Fox of entering sweetheart licensing deals with affiliates like FX and renegotiating an exclusive licensing deal with HBO to allow for less expensive streaming on Disney+ and Hulu. The case is TSG Entertainment Finance LLC v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 23STCV19433. Littler Mendelson filed a trade secret lawsuit in Illinois Northern District Federal Court on behalf of Chicago Dance History Project (CDHP). The case pursues claims against former CDHP Executive and Artistic Director Jenai Cutcher that accuse the defendant of refusing to return company property and retaining control of company accounts. The case is Chicago Dance History Project v. Cutcher, 1:23-cv-05595. Video game development company Gearbox Enterprises filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in Illinois Northern District Federal Court. The suit, brought by Aronberg Goldgehn Davis & Garmisa, alleges a group of defendants are producing and selling infringing games on e-commerce sites. The case is Gearbox Enterprises LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 1:23-cv-05593. Warner Bros. Entertainment, New Line Cinema and Scope Productions were slapped with a breach-of-contract lawsuit in California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, in relation to the horror films The Nun and The Conjuring 2. The court case was brought by Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz on behalf of Bonnie Aarons, who portrayed the demon nun Valak in the films. According to the complaint, the defendants have refused to pay Aarons her contractually required share of merchandising revenues. The case is Aarons v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., 23STCV19447. Legendary Pictures Funding is suing for copyright infringement in Illinois Northern District Federal Court in connection with the company's licensing of Godzilla vs. Kong movie merchandise. The suit targets online retailers for allegedly conspiring to distribute counterfeit merchandise. The suit was filed on behalf of the plaintiff by Keith Vogt Ltd. The case is Legendary Pictures Funding LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 1:23-cv-05563. Sirius XM Satellite Radio has been hit with a copyright lawsuit in Virginia Eastern District Federal Court. The court action was filed by Oppenheim + Zebrak on behalf of SoundExchange, the organization that collects digital performance royalties from sound recordings and distributes them to artists and copyright owners. SoundExchange alleges that Sirius, which offers bundled satellite and webcast digital-audio radio, is artificially inflating the value of its webcasting service when calculating the royalties it owes for the use of sound recordings, resulting in underpayments. The case is SoundExchange Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio Inc., 1:23-cv-01083. Entertainment Partners LLC, a production finance and management company, was hit with a data breach class action in California Superior Court, Los Angeles County. The suit was brought by Wucetich & Korovilas on behalf of individuals whose personally identifiable information was allegedly compromised in a cyberattack. The case is Moore v. Entertainment Partners LLC, 23STCV19250. …  Popular YouTube content creator Jimmy Donaldson a/k/a MrBeast, has sued Celebrity Virtual Dining for breach of contract in New York Supreme Court, New York County. The suit arises from a "virtual dining" concept in which MrBeast partnered with restaurants to deliver "MrBeast Burgers." According to the complaint, which was originally filed in federal court, the burgers were bad and often delivered late; the suit further contends that the defendant was more focused on expanding the "virtual dining" concept among other celebrities than assuring the quality of the burger. The suit was filed for Donaldson by Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz and Lavely & Singer. The case is Beast Investments LLC v. Celebrity Virtual Dining LLC, 1:23-cv-06658. The Walt Disney Company and several of the company's current and former executives and directors were slapped with a shareholder derivative lawsuit in California Central District Court. The lawsuit, brought by the Brown Law Firm, claims that the defendants misled investors regarding the overall health of the company and the potential of its Disney+ streaming service. The suit alleges that company insiders improperly shifted costs from Disney+ to legacy platforms to make Disney+ seem more successful than it was. The case is Gervat v. Chapek, 2:23-cv-06389. Live Nation Entertainment and its top officials were hit with a securities class action in California Central District Federal Court. The suit arises from the Taylor Swift Eras Tour pre-sale fiasco, when Ticketmaster's website crashed from high traffic. According to the complaint, the defendants failed to disclose that Live Nation had engaged in anticompetitive conduct, including charging high fees and retaliating against venues, which would reasonably lead to regulatory scrutiny, fines and penalties. The class is represented by Glancy Prongay & Murray and the Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz. The case is Donley v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., 2:23-cv-06343. The Walt Disney Co. and Hollywood Records Inc. were hit with a wage-and-hour lawsuit in California Superior Court, Los Angeles County. The court case was filed by the Law Offices of Ramin R. Younessi on behalf of a music research analyst who contends that he was not paid for all hours worked. The case is Wilson v. Disney Worldwide Services, 23STCV18216.

— This column was curated us­ing Law.com Radar.

 

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.