Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bay Plaza Community Center, LLC v. Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation, 2023 WL 3828078, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In landlord's action against commercial tenant, tenant appealed from Supreme Court's grant of landlord's summary judgment motion determining that tenant had not effected an early termination of the lease. The Appellate Division reversed, holding that any breach by tenant after the stated termination date did not make tenant's early termination ineffective.
The lease gave tenant the right to terminate early upon 60 days' notice of the termination date and payment of a termination fee equal to six months' rent and additional rent. The right to terminate early was conditions on the absence of an existing uncured default by tenant. Tenant provided 60 days' notice of an intent to terminate on March 31, 2021, and paid a $1.1 million early termination fee. At that time, landlord had not served tenant with any notice of default or notice to cure. Landlord, however, contended that tenant failed to comply with its leasehold obligation to remove all personal property and leave the premises broom clean upon termination of the lease. The lease provided that those obligations would survive termination of the lease. Moreover, landlord contended that tenant owed a balance of $33,128 as of the termination date. Supreme Court awarded summary judgment to landlord on its claim that tenant had not effected an early termination, concluding that tenant had not terminated the lease as of June 30, 2021 because it had not paid rent due after March 31, 2021 on a current basis. Tenant appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?