Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Cloud Marketplace: Stretch Your IT Budget by Partnering with Legal
With global financial insecurity prompting businesses to tighten their belts, every corporate department is trying to do more with less. IT is no exception. But the explosive growth of Big Data makes it harder than ever for IT to both manage its enterprise technology infrastructure and support the business's operational and strategic needs. In addition, new federal, state, and international regulations governing data privacy and security have complicated data management.
Legal teams lean on IT for support with discovery, legal holds, and data subject access requests (DSARs). But while every additional project saps IT's budget and resources — which are already stretched thin — interdepartmental collaboration offers an opportunity to stretch the organization's overall technology budget. IT teams that work with other internal business units can better contain costs, address data challenges, and improve governance by taking advantage of the cloud marketplace.
Cost Control: Buying Software on the Cloud Marketplace Saves Money
Despite budget constraints and cost-cutting initiatives, organizations striving for growth still need to acquire software. Fortunately, cloud marketplaces like AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, and Red Hat are revolutionizing the technology procurement process, offering a range of curated third-party solutions for every industry and business function.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.