Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Parc 56, LLC v. Board of Managers of the Parc Vendome Condominium, 2023 WL 3742953, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action by condominium unit owner for a declaration that the board had accepted its alteration agreement, the condominium appealed from Supreme Court's orders granting summary judgment to unit owner and holding the condominium in civil contempt. The Appellate Division modified to deny the motion for contempt and otherwise affirmed, holding that the condominium's delay constituted acceptance of the alteration agreement.
The subject unit is operated as a health club. Current unit owner's predecessor had submitted an alteration agreement and paid the required fee. Current unit owner returned a signed alteration agreement to the condominium's managing agent and requested that the prior owner's fee be applied to the application. The condominium declaration provided that an alteration agreement would be deemed approved if the condominium failed to object within 30 days. In this case, because the board failed to act on the application for many months, Supreme Court held that the application was deemed approved. The court also held that the condominium had violated its bylaws and a settlement agreement with the unit's prior owner by unreasonably withholding and delaying its waiver of the right of first refusal with respect to unit owner's lease with its prospective tenant. Supreme Court also held the condominium in civil contempt for failure to consent to ministerial Department of Building filings, including a PW-1 form.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?