Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Matter of Southern Realty and Development, LLC v. Town of Hurley, 2023 WL 4353674, AppDiv, Third Dept. (Opinion by McShan, J.)
In applicant's challenge to the town planning board's denial of site plan approval, the town appealed from Supreme Court's grant of the petition. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the board's traffic-related reasons for denying the application had been adequately addressed by applicant, and the board's other were conclusory and unsupported.
Applicant sought site plan approval for a drive-through Dunkin franchise. The planning board held a series of public hearings on the application and one nonpublic meeting. The board subsequently denied the application, citing primarily the negative impact the project would have on traffic in the area. Applicant then brought an article 78 proceeding challenging the denial as arbitrary and capricious. Supreme Court granted the petition, holding that the board had improperly conducted meetings out of the public view and that the board failed to provide adequate reasoning on the record to support its denial. The board appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.