IP News

Plaintiff Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. (Columbia) accused Defendant Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. (Seirus) of infringing the D'093 patent, which claims the "ornamental design of a heat reflective material." Id. The district court initially granted Columbia's motion for summary judgment of infringement of the D'093 patent. In doing so, the district court rejected Seirus's argument that its logo within the design of the material "made that design different enough from the claimed design" to preclude infringement. Id. at 5. The district court also "disregarded the Seirus logo altogether in its infringement analysis." Id. The district court further found that the "comparison prior art" was "far afield" from the D'093 patent and was therefore not "relevant comparison prior art." Id.

In the appeal of the district court's summary judgment determination of infringement, the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded for further proceedings. Id. at 6. In that decision, the Federal Circuit found that the district court "improperly declined" to consider Seirus's logo in the infringement analysis. Id. While using a logo in a design that is otherwise copied should not be a means to "escape liability," the Federal Circuit noted that a fact finder can consider "an ornamental logo, its placement, and its appearance as one among other potential differences between a patented design and an accused one." Id. The Federal Circuit further found that the district court improperly resolved factual issues regarding "comparison prior art" that should have been left for the jury. Id. at 7.