Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Leveraging Data and Deal Terms to Meet the Demands of the DOJ's New M&A Safe Harbor

By Patrick T. Campbell, Jonathan B. New, James A. Sherer, and Lauren E. Sternbach
December 01, 2023

On Oct. 4, 2023, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced a new safe harbor policy for merger and acquisition (M&A) transactions. Under the new safe harbor, acquiring companies that promptly and voluntarily disclose criminal misconduct discovered at the target company to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) within a certain time period, cooperate with the ensuing investigation, and engage in timely remediation, restitution, and disgorgement will receive the presumption of a declination (i.e., the DOJ will not prosecute the company). The policy applies to all DOJ components engaged in corporate criminal enforcement.

Monaco said that the DOJ did not want to discourage companies with effective compliance programs from acquiring companies with ineffective programs and a history of misconduct. This may be welcome news for companies looking for ways to manage their criminal successor liability risk in M&A deals. But the DOJ is also putting companies engaged in M&A on notice, as Monaco continued: "If your company does not perform effective due diligence or self-disclose misconduct at an acquired entity, it will be subject to full successor liability for that misconduct under the law."

This article describes the DOJ's new M&A safe harbor policy and also provides practical insights on how companies engaged in M&A can meet the DOJ's expectations. Given the relatively short time period acquiring companies will have to identify, self-disclose, and remediate criminal misconduct at the target company in order to fall within the safe harbor, companies should consider leveraging artificial intelligence and other advanced technologies to analyze data in the M&A due diligence process, which could provide efficiencies and increase the effectiveness of both pre- and post-acquisition reviews. Companies should also consider pushing for heightened post-closing protections from the target company in the deal documents because of both the safe harbor's increased incentives for voluntary disclosure of criminal misconduct and what may be a signal that the DOJ will be increasing its scrutiny of M&A deals.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.