Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

New Jersey Looks to Other States In Enacting Data Privacy Legislation

By John T. Wolak and William C. Martinez
December 01, 2023

In an era dominated by the ever-expanding digital and data-driven business landscape, state legislators across the United States have responded with a flurry of new laws aimed at safeguarding a consumer's personal information. As of this writing, four states have comprehensive laws in effect governing the use of personal information obtained from their respective state residents (California, Virginia, Colorado, and Connecticut), one state has a statute becoming effective at the end of 2023 (Utah), and eight states have passed similar statutes that become effective on various dates from July 1, 2024 through Jan. 1, 2026 (Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, Oregon, Tennessee, and Texas).

In recent years, the New Jersey Legislature has considered various versions of privacy legislation but has yet to adopt and implement comprehensive privacy legislation for New Jersey residents. Among the bills currently pending are New Jersey Assembly Bill A505, titled the "New Jersey Disclosure and Accountability Transparency Act" (NJ DaTA), and New Jersey Senate Bill S332, which requires online services to notify consumers of collection and disclosure of personal information. NJ DaTA was re-introduced in the Assembly on Jan. 11, 2022 (last Session Bill Number A3283), and contains detailed provisions regarding consumer privacy protections, including a proposal to establish an Office of Data Protection and Responsible Use in the Division of Consumer Affairs. At this juncture, there has been no publicly recorded activity on the NJ DaTA bill since it was introduced, and it appears to be stalled in the Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology Committee. However, S332 has seen significantly more progress, having passed in the Senate on Feb. 2, 2023, and being reported out of the Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology Committee with amendments as a Fourth Reprint on May 11, 2023.

The various privacy statutes — whether already enacted, or like New Jersey still in the legislative process — include provisions that have a direct (and often dramatic) impact on the scope of application, protections afforded to the respective state residents, and effect on businesses operating in the state. For example, such provisions relate to the following issues: i) the threshold for application; ii) the scope of an individual's rights with respect to the personal information collected; iii) the scope of any opt-in/opt-out rights for the collection and processing of personal information; iv) the existence of any private right of action; and v) the exceptions to application of the statute. As the New Jersey Legislature continues to evaluate, revise, and amend the terms of proposed comprehensive privacy legislation, a review of these key provisions in the current version of S332 and comparison to existing statutes offers guidance on what privacy rights and obligations may look like in New Jersey if and when the proposed legislation is ultimately enacted.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.