Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Biden-Harris Administration rang in Día De Los Muertos with a sweeping "Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence". Packing more tricks and treats than a suburban soccer mom, this sweeping order was ambitious, to say the least, artfully seeking to thread the needle and balance fear and desire when it comes to the AI renaissance sweeping the globe.
This attempt to regulate the meteoric rise of AI without stifling innovation and the country's ability to compete in the AI marketplace on a global scale was no small undertaking. The focus on mitigating bias, promoting transparency through red team testing and safeguarding privacy while fostering an open playing field on continued development of global leading AI systems was immediately lauded.
And yet, hidden within the body of the order in section 4.2 (b) i and ii lay something that might make this sweeping and ambitious order flop.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?