Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Distressed Real Estate Bankruptcies Continue, Despite Interest Rate Peak
Although interest rates may have peaked, we continue to expect a large volume of distressed real estate debtors to utilize the bankruptcy system over the next couple of years. This article analyzes two recent decisions regarding distressed real estate bankruptcies, both of which involve rights of real estate lenders against proceeds of collateral other than the real estate itself. One involves the right of a lender to assert a deficiency claim against proceeds of the bankrupt debtor's insurance policy, and the other concerns whether a debtor can use the rents derived from the property that were pledged as additional collateral for the loan.
|Lender Permitted to Assert Deficiency Claim Against Insurance Policy
In the first case, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York issued an opinion on Sept. 21 in In re Savva's Restaurant, Case No.: 22-70382-reg. According to the opinion, a mortgage lender sought to recover under the debtor's insurance policy following destruction of the property in a fire. The borrower filed a bankruptcy case and sold the property in a sale pursuant to a Chapter 11 plan. The lender entered into a stipulation consenting to the sale and agreeing its secured claim would be reduced by the amount of the net proceeds of the sale. The lender then asserted the deficiency amount against the insurance policy.
The insurer had rescinded the policy as a result of the debtor making misrepresentations in the insurance application. As is typically the case, the lender was listed as an additional insured and loss payee under the policy. The insurer argued that the lender could not assert a claim under the policy because rescission of the policy as to the insured also rescinds the policy for additional insureds. The bankruptcy court disagreed. The court reasoned that while controlling state law provided an additional insured's right to collect is derivative of the primary insured's continuing right to coverage, the lender was also a loss payee under the policy and a loss payee under an insurance policy has an independent contract with the insurer that is not dependent on an enforceable agreement between the insurer and the primary named insured.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.