Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Matter of Penney Property Sub Holdings LLC v. Town of Amherst, 2023 WL 6528859, AppDiv, Fourth Dept. (memorandum opinion).
In landowner's proceeding to annul condemnation of its land, the Appellate Division confirmed the condemnation, rejecting landowner's argument about inadequate notice and insufficient public purpose to justify the condemnation.
The town authorized condemnation of 62 acres consisting of a mall and surrounding parking area. Landowner's 2.3 acres were among the 62 acres. Landowner operated a fully functional store on the property. When the town instituted condemnation proceedings, notice was sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to landowner's tax billing address. Landowner never received the notice. At the hearing the town adopted a resolution authorizing acquisition of the property for redevelopment purposes. Landowner then brought this proceeding challenging the condemnation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?