Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Government agencies and private organizations alike are seeking new strategies to combat climate change — including offering programs and incentives to promote inventorship in the energy sector. These programs encourage innovation for both renewable energy technologies and technologies that can make conventional energy sources more sustainable. Among them, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has created or expanded several programs to promote the development of sustainable energy. For patent owners and inventors in the energy sector, these programs can provide a financial and administrative edge for the development and protection of their intellectual property, as well as play a beneficial role their overall IP strategy.
Just last summer, the USPTO launched the Climate Change Mitigation Pilot Program (CCMPP) to promote the development of clean energy technologies by accelerating the examination process for eligible patent applications. The CCMPP applies to any innovations that are "designed to make progress toward achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions" by covering any claim for an invention that removes greenhouse gases, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, or monitors greenhouse gas emissions. See, 88 FR 35841 (June 1, 2023). To apply for the program, applicants need only file a petition to make special their application at the USPTO using the required form. See, "Climate Change Mitigation Pilot Program," USPTO. After this form is submitted, the identified application is advanced out of turn so that a First Office Action is issued earlier than normal. Id. Unfortunately, after the First Office Action, the speed of examination returns to normal.
If an applicant wants the entire process to be expedited, the USPTO also has an award program called the Patents for Humanity Program which grants winners certificates that allow some ex parte proceedings to be expedited. See, "USPTO Patents for Humanity Program: Green Energy," USPTO. This program has existed since 2013, but only recently added a category for "green patents." Id. One aspect of this program to consider is that applications only open once about every two years and not everyone who applies is awarded a certificate. Id. In addition, a green patent must have already been applied for or granted. Id. The owner of the patent must then submit a description of how the technology in the patent positively affects the environment to apply. Id. While the certificate to expedite a proceeding can be used on a patent with any subject matter, the application process may not be worth it to companies who deal primarily in green energy as their applications are already being advanced out of turn anyways. Id.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.