Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Innovative Development Opportunities Abound In Philadelphia Commercial Land Condominiums
Condominium development has been around since the 1960s and has ramped up in recent years. Within larger parcels where multiple structures or different uses are planned, developers in the greater Philadelphia area are increasingly turning toward a newer form of joint ownership of property to develop large projects: the horizontal, or land, condominium. While the appetite for building new vertical residential condominium buildings in Philadelphia has slowed since the onset of the pandemic, many commercial developers are now considering early on whether applying a land condominium regime makes sense for integrated development projects.
The basic condominium concept is that a person or a company owns their individual unit within the condominium, and together with their fee ownership of their individual unit, the owner has a proportionate undivided interest in the entirety of the common elements of the condominium. Collectively, all of the owners in the condominium own 100% of the common elements of the condominium. Think, for example, of a vertical residential condominium tower: a person owns their own unit within the building, and all of the owners together own the common parts of the building such as hallways, the elevator bays, and the reception areas on the ground floor. Instead of paying rent to a landlord, the owner of the unit pays their own mortgage and pays condominium fees to a unit owners association established for the maintenance of the common elements of the building.
Land condominiums work similarly to their vertical and residential condominium counterparts. However, instead of spreading the condominium up into the air with units stacked atop one another (as is typical of vertical condominiums), the land condominium tends to spread horizontally with units standing apart from each other. To the average onlooker, a land condominium may appear similar to an office park or a shopping center with various owners.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?