Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
IP News
In Patrick v. Poree, No. 23-12732 (11th Cir. Dec. 14, 2023), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the denial of default judgment and summary judgment of copyright infringement claims based on a lack of evidence that the plaintiff owned a valid copyright.
Yoland Patrick, an artist manager, appealed from a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia denying her motions for default judgment and summary judgment. The complaint states that April Poree, an artist Yoland managed, used and performed the song "I Do What I Want" without her permission. The song, produced by Yoland's husband, Sherman Patrick, released in 2019 and was notably featured on an episode of song artist Lizzo's television show "Watch Out for the Big Grrrls." In July 2019, the song was registered with the United States Copyright Office, listing Poree and Sherman as the "Authorship on Application" and the "Copyright Claimant." The Copyright Registration form lists Yoland's name next to "Rights and Permissions."
After the song registered, Poree performed it and made it available on several streaming services. In response, Yoland sued, claiming that she is the valid owner of the song and Poree's performance amounted to copyright infringement. Poree failed to answer the complaint, and Yoland filed a motion for default, which the clerk granted. Because Yoland did not seek a sum certain, she filed a motion for default judgment, or in the alternative summary judgment. The district court denied both of Yoland's motions based on a lack of evidence that she owned a valid copyright, preventing her from stating a claim for which relief could be granted.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?