Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

'Keyword Warrants' Pose Privacy Threat

By Logan Youngworth-Wright, Bowman Taylor and Rubin Sinins
February 01, 2024

On Dec. 12, 2023, Google announced it would no longer centrally store users' location history data. Location information will now only be saved temporarily on users' devices, where the data can be erased. This significant policy change may effectively end the practice of seeking "geofence warrants," a mechanism used by law enforcement to identify criminal suspects through searches of Google's database for devices present at a crime scene. Without Google's reservoir of location data, a geofence warrant is futile.

Police continue to utilize other digital tools to track suspects. One such tool, "keyword warrants," poses an even greater threat of privacy invasion. Like geofence warrants, the practice of seeking a keyword warrant is a technique of dragnet policing. A keyword warrant requires the production of all IP addresses for anyone who inputs a particular word or phrase into an internet search engine. The search results are then used to identify a device user. Asking Google or another internet service provider (ISP) to identify the person who typed a particular word or phrase requires no evidence of that individual's involvement in crime. Such requests instead invade innocent users' private information and inject it into criminal investigations, all without any basis other than a user entering a phrase in a search engine on their home computer.

More intrusive than geofence warrants, these keyword warrant applications cannot promise the court that the user was present at the crime scene, only that the user may have been thinking about something relevant to a crime or location under investigation. This raises questions like: Should the state police our thoughts? And, is it constitutional for a judge to authorize such a fishing expedition into the online activities of the public at large?

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.