Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
5 Star Holdings NY, LLC v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., 2023 WL 6853786, AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion).
In commercial tenant's wrongful eviction action, tenant appealed from Supreme Court's dismissal of the claim. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that an eviction subsequently reversed on appeal is not an unlawful eviction within the meaning of RPAPL 853.
Tenant had leased a 13,000 square foot property from landlord. Landlord brought a proceeding to evict tenant for nonpayment of rent, and received a judgment of eviction. Tenant was then evicted. The following year, the Appellate Division reversed the judgment of eviction and remanded for a judgment dismissing the petition. Tenant then brought the instant action for wrongful eviction. Supreme Court granted landlord's motion to dismiss.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?