Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Continuing to provide analysis on distressed real estate cases, we decided to report on two cases that present different issues. One involves the debtor's sale of real estate over the objection of the secured lender, which was approved. The other involves a debtor's attempt to enjoin a construction bond company from continuing to pay claims by subcontractors after the filing of the bankruptcy case, which was denied.
|The first case is in In re Lee, Case No. 19-71337- JTL (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2024), where the debtor sought bankruptcy court approval of a sale of real property over the objection of a lender with an undisputed lien against the property. According to the opinion, the lender filed a proof of claim for $244,234.76, secured by the debtor's real property, which consisted of a home on 43 acres of land. The debtor proposed to sell 15 of the 43 acres to a third party for $265,000. The motion stated the lender's lien would attach to the proceeds of the sale, and the lender would retain its lien in the remaining 28 acres. The lender objected, claiming the amount owed by the debtor was $294,915.99.
The court began its analysis by noting that a debtor may sell property free and clear of interests pursuant to Section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code if any of the five subsections of Section 363(f)(1)-(5) are met. The only subsections at issue were 363(f)(3) and 363(f)(4). Section 363(f)(3) authorizes a sale free and clear of liens "only if such interest is a lien and the price at which such property is to be sold is greater than the aggregate value of all liens on such property." See, 11 U.S.C. Section 363(f)(3). The lender argued that the sale price of the property — $265,000 — was less than the value of its lien — $294,915. The court ruled that the sale proceeds would satisfy the lender's lien because the proposed sale proceeds exceeded the amount of its filed proof of claim, and the lender had failed to provide evidence in support of the amounts it claimed it was owed. The court also found that the sale was authorized under Section 363(f)(4), which states that a sale may proceed free and clear of an interest that is in bona fide dispute. The debtor testified that the lender was owed only $241,976.23, and had filed an objection to the lender's proof of claim, disputing amounts charged for taxes, escrow payments, inspection fees and broker price options. The court found the lender's claim was in bona fide dispute.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.